Agree with VandyMan. This had become a standard feature on new DACs, especially in this price range. It was plenty evident at the CES 2012 high-end show. Benchmark, get the async USB out supporting 24/192 asap and you'll have a customer in me....
Thanks for the feedback...it's always good to hear from y'all to find out what you need.
Our USB products are limited to 96 kHz because it enables 'native' operation across the board, which is the most ideal for bit-transparent operation.
However, we take your suggestions very seriously, and we will continue to investigate the technology to determine when it is ideal to build a 192 kHz interface.
Since the DAC1 re-samples (upsamples or downsamples) all input signals to 110KHz, supporting 192KHz USB input would seem to be of limited benefit. I could say 192KHz offers limited benefit, period. But that might be controversial ;-)
Agree with VandyMan. This
Agree with VandyMan. This had become a standard feature on new DACs, especially in this price range. It was plenty evident at the CES 2012 high-end show. Benchmark, get the async USB out supporting 24/192 asap and you'll have a customer in me....
Pnkfam
Thanks for the
Thanks for the feedback...it's always good to hear from y'all to find out what you need.
Our USB products are limited to 96 kHz because it enables 'native' operation across the board, which is the most ideal for bit-transparent operation.
However, we take your suggestions very seriously, and we will continue to investigate the technology to determine when it is ideal to build a 192 kHz interface.
Best,
Elias
Since the DAC1 re-samples
Since the DAC1 re-samples (upsamples or downsamples) all input signals to 110KHz, supporting 192KHz USB input would seem to be of limited benefit. I could say 192KHz offers limited benefit, period. But that might be controversial ;-)